Classical Greece and the Hellenistic World summary

The following texts are the property of their respective authors and we thank them for giving us the opportunity to share for free to students, teachers and users of the Web their texts will used only for illustrative educational and scientific purposes only.

All the information in our site are given for nonprofit educational purposes

The information of medicine and health contained in the site are of a general nature and purpose which is purely informative and for this reason may not replace in any case, the council of a doctor or a qualified entity legally to the profession.

Classical Greece and the Hellenistic World summary

Chapter 6 Classical Greece and the Hellenistic World

Introduction

Around 800 B.C.E., a second civilization center began to develop around the islands of the Aegean Sea and the Greek mainland. With modifications, Greek civilization lasted until about 400 B.C.E., when it was replaced by an imperial state under Macedonian kings. Greek civilization built on previous accomplishments of both Egyptian and Middle Eastern civilizations, as well as the early civilizations of Crete and Mycenae located in the eastern Mediterranean and on the Greek mainland. By 1100 B.C.E., these two formative civilizations had entered a period of prolonged decline from which Greece emerged after three centuries.

The Persian Empire: Parallel Power in the Middle East

Following the decline of the successive empires in the Middle East, Cyrus the Great established a Persian Empire in 550 B.C.E. that incorporated all of the Middle East as well as portions of India. Within this new empire, a new religion, Zoroastrianism, emerged to replace the more typical polytheism of the Middle East. Zoroastrianism regarded life as a struggle between forces of good and evil. Unable to conquer the Greek mainland, the Persian Empire eventually fell to Alexander the Great. While it lasted, the Persian Empire paralleled the classical development of Greece.

The Political Character of Classical Greece

Introduction

There were two primary catalysts for the development of Greek civilization. Despite the Indo-European invasions that destroyed Mycenae and other early Greek cities, the heritage of the earlier civilizations were retained through oral traditions and myths. The second impetus to the development of Greek civilization after 800 B.C.E. was the general renewal of trade in the eastern Mediterranean. Economic growth prompted the expansion of the population and social change, which encouraged the development of new political structures.

The Emergence of Greek Forms

Greek political and cultural evolution began in the eighth century B.C.E. Political evolution was interrupted by internal warfare in the fifth century B.C.E., but cultural evolution continued with little break into the Hellenistic period. The Greek adaptation of the Phoenician alphabet facilitated cultural and economic development. The Homeric epics, the Iliad and Odyssey were recorded at this time and strongly influenced the common mythology of Greek culture. A distinctive Greek art, initially derivative from Egyptian culture, also began to emerge.

The City-State as a Political Unit

In the period immediately after 800 B.C.E., Greek political structures centered on the city-state a regional government centered in a major city but including the agricultural hinterland. City-states varied in territory and population. When Greeks colonized other regions of the eastern Mediterranean, they carried the distinctive city-state form of government with them. The city-state format made political centralization in Greece virtually impossible, but it did encourage active participation in local government. In the early stages of city-state development, land-owning aristocrats were most powerful. Some of the early city- states had kings, most recognized free farmers as citizens, and the governments often contained councils.
After 700 B.C.E., the dominance of the aristocracies was challenged. Particularly in areas with strong commercial activity, merchants and urban artisans sought to break the political monopoly of the landowners. Increasingly wealthy landowners also began to squeeze out small farmers. By the sixth century B.C.E., urban groups and small farmers saw themselves as politically disadvantaged. In some city-states these groups supported tyrants against aristocratic clans. Because tyranny contradicted the accepted concept of self- government, reformers arose who attempted to ameliorate the social and political inequities through legal innovation while still maintaining public participation in government.
The growing need for strong military forces also produced incentive to increase the number of citizens within the city- states. Participation in public life, either politically or militarily, became the norm within the Greek city-state. Identification with individual gods also produced a sense of public loyalty.

The Rise of Democracy in Athens

Although city-state constitutions varied, democracy tended to become more common by the fifth century. Athens was the chief example of democratic government. Athens had passed from aristocratic dominance, through civil dispute to tyranny under Pisastratus. After the tyrant's death, the reformer Cleisthenes reestablished a council, elected by all citizens, that prepared an agenda for an assembly of all citizens of the city-state. All decisions of the state emanated from the public assembly, although a small group of leading politicians often dominated the group.
Citizens were expected to serve in the army, served as jurors for trials, and were eligible for the many councils that comprised the city-state administration. Despite the active participation of many adult males in the Athenian democracy, many people were excluded. Women, slaves, and foreigners were excluded from civic life. Aristocratic politicians, such as Pericles, controlled much of the government, even when they did not hold public office. Athenian democracy provided for the exile (ostracism) of politicians considered likely to establish tyrannies.

A Comparison of Greek and Chinese Political Styles

The Greek system, which emphasized political virtue and responsibility and which maintained a hierarchic social system, in some ways mirrored the Confucian concept of social and political harmony. But the decentralized nature of the Greek polis was conceptually different than the Chinese insistence on a single, centralized government. The Greeks also placed more weight on individual participation in government than on a formal bureaucracy.

Greek Diplomacy and the Tensions of United Effort

During the four centuries of Greek political evolution, individual city-states established colonies throughout the eastern Mediterranean. These colonies exported Greek culture and political ideas. There were some things in which Greek city-states participated as a group. Most city-states participated in the annual Olympic games and recognized the religious significance of the oracle priests at Delphi.
A coalition of city-states led by Athens and Sparta defeated two Persian invasions of the Greek mainland at the beginning of the fifth century B.C.E. In the decades after the Persian Wars, Athens came to dominate a confederation of city-states initially formed to control the Aegean Sea. Athens was able to covert the Delian League into an empire. The empire complicated the internal politics of Athens and produced division and strife.

Athens versus Sparta

The creation of the Athenian empire aroused the suspicion and opposition of Sparta. More agrarian and aristocratic than Athens, Sparta had its own confederation of allied city- states. The two rivals began a prolonged conflict, the Peloponnesian War, in 431 B.C.E. Although both sides suffered enormous losses, the war continued until 404 B.C.E., when Sparta finally defeated Athens.

The Hellenistic Period

Introduction

The Spartan defeat of Athens in the Peloponnesian War did not result in political unity. Athens and Thebes successfully broke the Spartan hegemony, but soon began to make war on each other. The resultant political confusion prepared the way for the Macedonian conquest of the Greek city-states and the establishment of the Macedonian empire.

Macedonian Conquest

King Philip II of Macedonia (359-336 B.C.E.) strengthened the Macedonian armed forces just as the attempts at unity in the Greek mainland failed. By 338 B.C.E., Philip II was able to conquer the city-states of southern Greece and created a Macedonian hegemony. Although Greek city-states technically continued to exist, they were subjected to a Macedonian empire.

Alexander the Great

When Philip died, Greece and the kingdom of Macedonia fell to his son, Alexander. Alexander launched an assault on the Persian Empire that resulted in the conquest of Persia, Egypt, and the Middle East. Alexander's armies actually penetrated as far as India before turning back. It was Alexander's purpose to unite the centralized political tradition of the East with Greek culture. To this end, he established cities throughout the conquered region. Before his scheme could be finalized, Alexander died at the age of 33.

Later Hellenistic States

Alexander's empire fragmented into three successor states: Seleucid Asia, Antigonid Macedonia and Greece, and Ptolemaic Egypt. Initially these states shared with the Greek world a renewed prosperity based on commerce and cultural exchange. Eventually the favorable position of the Hellenistic cities produced political dissatisfaction in the agricultural hinterlands. By the second century B.C.E., the Hellenistic successor kingdoms weakened. The Hellenistic Middle East was characterized by the exchange of ideas between Greece, Persia, India, Egypt, and Africa. The spread of Greek culture was a significant factor in creating an intellectual framework in this part of the civilized world.

Creativity in Greek and Hellenistic Culture

Introduction

Art and philosophy were the key cultural contributions of Greek civilization.

Religion, Philosophy, and Science

Greek religion featured a pantheon of anthropomorphic gods and goddesses. Individual deities patronized human activities or represented forces of nature. Greek religion did not emphasize the afterworld, as did other Indo-European religions, nor did they direct believers to more esoteric or spiritual considerations. Greek religion failed to excite much emotion, and popular "mystery" religions arose that offered greater spiritual intimacy. The existence of mystery religions in Greek culture is somewhat similar to Daoism in China.
Frustrated by the limitations of Greek religion, some thinkers turned to philosophical systems that offered better opportunities for explanation of natural phenomena. Some thinkers, such as Socrates and Plato, were concerned with development of ethical systems offering logical analysis of social and political action. In the Hellenistic period Stoics taught that human independence could be achieved through strict discipline of the body and physical bravery. These ethical systems were later blended with Christian theology.
Philosophers gave various answers to the question of political organization. Plato suggested a state ruled by philosopher/kings. Most Greek political theory emphasized the concept of a balanced constitution with outlets for both aristocratic and popular influence. The principle measure of political ethics was the utility of the individual constitution. Classical Greek philosophy stressed both rationalism and skepticism. Plato suggested that man could approach knowledge of absolute truth through an understanding of ideal forms. Greek emphasis on rationalism bore some resemblance to Chinese Confucianism.
Greek emphasis on rationalism gave rise to scientific exploration, although little experimentation. Greek thinkers were interested in the elements from which the cosmos was created, which in turn led to interest in mathematics and geometry. Empirical discoveries were made in medicine and astronomy, although the astronomical observations of Ptolemy stressed the position of the earth at the center of the universe. Archimedes developed theories of physics relating to water power and mathematics.

Literature and the Visual Arts

Science and mathematics were less important than the arts in conveying key aspects of Greek culture. Drama, vital to religious festivals, took a central role in Greek expression. Greek dramatists produced both comedies and tragedies, with the latter receiving greater emphasis. Dramatists, both comedians and tragedians, illustrated the limits of human reason and the consequences of becoming ensnared in powerful passions. Greek drama provided the rules that governed later playwrights. The Greeks also developed history as a form of literature. Greek artists were most advanced in sculpture and architecture. Over time, the Greeks formulated three distinct architectural styles Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian. Greek art and literature was a product of contemporary society, and individual works were often functional.

The Principles of Greek Culture

Greek cultural achievement rested on four major principles. Greek political life was encapsulated in political theory, which allowed it to survive and influence subsequent civilizations. Art and sculpture served to glorify human achievement. Greek drama and philosophy emphasized the centrality of the human and the secular. Greek philosophy stressed the logical and rational aspects within the natural world. Despite its importance to later western civilizations, Greek culture did have limitations. Greek science was often more speculative than experimental and, thus, was often filled with error. Greek culture was predicated on the dominance of a literate, aristocratic elite. It was little interested in adopting popular values.

Hellenistic Culture During and After Alexander

Greek culture did change over the centuries. The decline of the independent city-states in the fourth century B.C.E. produced a distinctive Hellenistic style. There was little innovation in literature. The wealth of the Hellenistic states contributed to vast amounts of monumental-scale building, although no new architectural styles were developed. Hellenistic thinkers were particularly interested in science and mathematics. Contributions were made in astronomy and geography. There were few innovations in either medicine or biology.

Patterns of Greek and Hellenistic Society

Introduction

Greek society was typical of ancient agricultural economies. Distinctive features were the emphasis on slavery and a distinct ambivalence toward the status of women.

Economic and Social Structure

Greek civilization closely resembles other civilizations in which invading peoples settled down to agriculture. Initially society was divided into a militarized aristocracy and a larger group of free landowners. As the Greek economy became more commercialized, the society became more diverse and hierarchic. The mountainous geography of Greece produced a greater reliance on trade and colonization than in India or China. Frequent war produced a greater dependence on slavery and reduced emphasis on improved manufacturing technology.
Greek society remained dominated by an aristocratic, land- owning elite. Greek politics and art was largely aristocratic in tone. Greek society depended on commerce, but assigned relatively low social status to merchants. Greek merchants were regarded as socially more acceptable than their counterparts in China, but perhaps enjoyed less status than merchants in India.

Rural Life and Agriculture

The Greek population was predominantly rural and agricultural, despite the political and cultural dominance of the cities. From the eighth century B.C.E., there was a tendency for aristocrats to force small farmers to become tenants or laborers. Aristocrats were better able to convert their operations to commercial crops olives and grapes thus giving them a competitive advantage over their less wealthy neighbors. Mediterranean agriculture was particularly market oriented, with the result that basic food supplies often had to be imported.
The purpose of Greek colonization was, in part, to develop new sources of grain. Commercial forms of agriculture continued to dominate in the Hellenistic period. Commercial agriculture stimulated the development of small towns rather than rural villages. Small towns offered peasants market opportunities, but remained sufficiently close to the fields to allow continued employment as agricultural laborers.

Slavery and Production

Slavery was a key component of the classical Mediterranean economy. City-states used slaves for all types of labor from agriculture to mining. Manumission of slaves was relatively common. Control of slave labor systems required extensive military controls. Use of slaves discouraged investment in technological improvement. As a result, Greece lagged behind both China and India in technological development.

Men, Women, and Social Divisions

In Greek law and culture, women were inferior to men. Female infanticide was practiced. Despite their low social status, some Greek women were active in business and did control urban property. Greek marriages were arranged by the patriarchal household head, and husbands could divorce their wives at will. Women were restricted to certain portions of the household. Conditions for women appear to have improved in the Hellenistic era.

Conclusion: A Complex Legacy

Greek civilization established certain cultural characteristics for western civilization. Greek political ideas were more enduring than the actual political constitutions of the city-states. Slavery was an important component of the classical West. Perhaps the most significant contributions were in art and philosophy. Like India, cultural cohesion in Greece rested more in the realm of ideas than in political empire. Greek civilization has often been considered an integral foundation for American culture. For a truly world perspective, it is necessary to see Greek civilization in the context of other world cultures.

Source : http://soyoungkim.wikispaces.com/file/view/ch06.doc

Web site link: http://soyoungkim.wikispaces.com/

Google key word : Classical Greece and the Hellenistic World summary file type : doc

Author : not indicated on the source document of the above text

If you are the author of the text above and you not agree to share your knowledge for teaching, research, scholarship (for fair use as indicated in the United States copyrigh low) please send us an e-mail and we will remove your text quickly.